<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wirearchy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wirearchy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wirearchy.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Co-Creating as Disruption to the Dominant Cultural Framework by wireuser</title>
		<link>http://wirearchy.com/2013/05/09/co-creating-as-disruption-to-the-dominant-cultural-framework/#comment-8245</link>
		<dc:creator>wireuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wirearchy.com/?p=2194#comment-8245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You got it, Bruce !

Yeah .. as we&#039;ve discussed before, the dynamics to which I made reference are &#039;coming&quot; and growing, like deep ocean currents.   It&#039;s not about &quot;wired&quot; and/or &quot;wireless&quot;, it&#039;s about deepening, broadening, making relevant (and more powerful) the individual and group interactions and exchanges that are bottom-up, lateral and top-down.

While I understand that hierarchy is &#039;natural&#039; and / or omnipresent, we may well come to see in the fullness of time that the &quot;architecture of organizing&quot; codified from / by the Industrial Era and Taylorism is but an aberrant blip in the history of human sociology.  You and I will most likely be dead by the time that realization may come to pass ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got it, Bruce !</p>
<p>Yeah .. as we&#8217;ve discussed before, the dynamics to which I made reference are &#8216;coming&#8221; and growing, like deep ocean currents.   It&#8217;s not about &#8220;wired&#8221; and/or &#8220;wireless&#8221;, it&#8217;s about deepening, broadening, making relevant (and more powerful) the individual and group interactions and exchanges that are bottom-up, lateral and top-down.</p>
<p>While I understand that hierarchy is &#8216;natural&#8217; and / or omnipresent, we may well come to see in the fullness of time that the &#8220;architecture of organizing&#8221; codified from / by the Industrial Era and Taylorism is but an aberrant blip in the history of human sociology.  You and I will most likely be dead by the time that realization may come to pass <img src='http://wirearchy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Co-Creating as Disruption to the Dominant Cultural Framework by Bruce Stewart</title>
		<link>http://wirearchy.com/2013/05/09/co-creating-as-disruption-to-the-dominant-cultural-framework/#comment-8244</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wirearchy.com/?p=2194#comment-8244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very well done, Jon. One of the things that intrigues me is how little of this, at the end of the day, needs the &quot;wire&quot; (or the &quot;wireless&quot;) that first triggered the Wirearchy concept. Simple methods of discussion, leaderless emergence of consensus, and a tolerance of ambiguity and not knowing the outcome in advance carries most of the load. Occupy, in turn, demonstrated just how this could mobilize many, in many locales — it wasn&#039;t limited to just line-of-sight or a Dunbar&#039;s Number of participants.

Much to think about here, and for this, I thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well done, Jon. One of the things that intrigues me is how little of this, at the end of the day, needs the &#8220;wire&#8221; (or the &#8220;wireless&#8221;) that first triggered the Wirearchy concept. Simple methods of discussion, leaderless emergence of consensus, and a tolerance of ambiguity and not knowing the outcome in advance carries most of the load. Occupy, in turn, demonstrated just how this could mobilize many, in many locales — it wasn&#8217;t limited to just line-of-sight or a Dunbar&#8217;s Number of participants.</p>
<p>Much to think about here, and for this, I thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Co-Creating as Disruption to the Dominant Cultural Framework by The new enclosure movement &#124; Harold Jarche</title>
		<link>http://wirearchy.com/2013/05/09/co-creating-as-disruption-to-the-dominant-cultural-framework/#comment-8191</link>
		<dc:creator>The new enclosure movement &#124; Harold Jarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wirearchy.com/?p=2194#comment-8191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] People everywhere are seeing and feeling the loss of parts of their lives to the ‘enclosure’ of privatization and the diminishment of the commons (the public spaces where certain types of common services and goods are made available to the public). - Jon Husband [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] People everywhere are seeing and feeling the loss of parts of their lives to the ‘enclosure’ of privatization and the diminishment of the commons (the public spaces where certain types of common services and goods are made available to the public). &#8211; Jon Husband [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Is Wirearchy ? by Week 8: Course Reflections – Command-and-Control is Obsolete &#124; Anthony W. Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://wirearchy.com/what-is-wirearchy/#comment-7963</link>
		<dc:creator>Week 8: Course Reflections – Command-and-Control is Obsolete &#124; Anthony W. Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 03:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wirearchy.com/?page_id=2004#comment-7963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Husband, J. (n.d.) What is wirearchy? Retrieved from http://wirearchy.com/what-is-wirearchy/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Husband, J. (n.d.) What is wirearchy? Retrieved from <a href="http://wirearchy.com/what-is-wirearchy/" rel="nofollow">http://wirearchy.com/what-is-wirearchy/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on InfoMutation &#8211; we must build bridges between our past and our future by René Barsalo</title>
		<link>http://wirearchy.com/2013/04/15/infomutation-we-must-build-bridges-between-our-past-and-our-future/#comment-7681</link>
		<dc:creator>René Barsalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wirearchy.com/?p=2200#comment-7681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Virginia. Regarding global cultures, the main difference might be that today they are growing by &quot;networked minds&quot; contact, rather than face to face? As to the digital cultural artefacts, living in a mutation period means that things are not rock solid... just went through a family album that spans from daguerreotypes to smartphones pictures. More pictures than before, still just a few for posterity. This would be a good subject for pre and post 85 discussions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Virginia. Regarding global cultures, the main difference might be that today they are growing by &#8220;networked minds&#8221; contact, rather than face to face? As to the digital cultural artefacts, living in a mutation period means that things are not rock solid&#8230; just went through a family album that spans from daguerreotypes to smartphones pictures. More pictures than before, still just a few for posterity. This would be a good subject for pre and post 85 discussions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
